Why do we need God(s)...?
God according to me is nothing but a Belief…! As belief is just
a feeling and you cannot prove that physically, so does the existence of God.
It cannot be proved.
But Belief is a psychological requirement. Hence I feel, in this society, God is also a Psychological requirement.
If God is a Psychological Requirement then
Religion is just a Social Requirement.
Religion is nothing but an organized collection of beliefs
which is required to manipulate a large number of people. Then the question arises
Is it correct to manipulate people. Manipulating people can both be positive
also be negative.
Ex1: Parent telling
a child, God will punish you if you tell lies. (This is a positive type of manipulation
driven with a good intention).
Ex2: A Priest
telling a devotee, you will not conceive a Child until I does a Pooja to God worth
Rs.10,000 + Taxes. (This is a negative manipulation driven by selfish motive).
Both are possible only in the form of religion. On both the occasions
the parent / priest were trying to manipulate / Influence them on the basis of
the faith that the child / devotee have in God.
What I am trying to say is that religions was a medium which
was being used to transfer the values to next generation.
Then came the Logical Era in 20th
century, where people instead of relying on people / beliefs everything was
driven by logic. This was the phase when the religion failed logically to prove
the existence of god. But those modern era people who were against religion,
actually failed to understand the fact that GOD was just a medium which was
coined to communicate many important things which we call it as values. Because
everybody will not understand logic. Hence we cannot succeed at all the occasions
if we try to communicate things through Logic.
Also the major problem with Logic
is that it does not concentrate on subjective reality. It looks everything and
everybody as mere objects. All individuals cannot be controlled by a set if
logical rule book. Each person is different and the circumstances around us is
also variable. So, rules are required but always with a context.
Many religions gave importance to
subjective reality, especially I liked Hinduism. Hinduism didn’t emphasized on rules
rather emphasis more on Dharma. Dharma is not a rule to be followed. Dharma is
a concept to be understood. For Eg: Breaking a War Rule is not at all
acceptable. But Lord Krishna itself does that. Why..? To upheld Dharma. Whereas
on the other hand Lord Ram follows all the rules and led by an example.
Hinduism worship both the lords. The
difference in their characteristics is because of the different circumstance
around them. Both used different ways to upheld dharma.
Recently I was reading about
Sikhism. Many of us would’ve heard this often that you cannot see a Sikh Beggar.
Mostly it is true also. I read a peculiar reason for the same. They have this
system called langar. Langar is just a Free Kitchen. First Sikh Guru Guru Nanak
Dev Ji started this to upheld equality between all. So some quote that because
of this system, as the major requirement of Food is being taken care by the
religion hence they don’t tend to beg. Whatever may be the reason, but if a
religion can bring such a remarkable change to this society, then why don’t we
need religion. Also Sikhism being a younger religion (Compared to others) they’ve
understood the changing reality around them and have given equal importance to female
gender too. When compared to many other religions in which there is huge gender
inequality, Sikhism looks both the gender equally without any partiality.
The thing is because of the
misusers of religion and the terrible ill effects of the same, many of us have
stated rejecting / hating religion. Through this whole article I am just trying
to clarify that Religion is not bad and not meant to be bad also. But of course
I accept the fact that religion is being used bad, and we need to get out of
that. And without understanding the intention of the existence of religion, we
will not be able to get out of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment